News Center

Home Page

A community forum for the discussion of progressive ideas


Volume 1, Number 3

October 2000

Free -- Donations appreciated


Will the real growth management plan please stand up!  
Proposition 202 gives voters a chance to rein in urban sprawl

By Becky Schipper - Flagstaff Resident

For too long, developers have decided our community’s fate. In Flagstaff, we have seen that even the most well thought out and publicly supported plans for community development are routinely set aside to accommodate developers’ desires. Former Council member Norm Wallen has pointed out on numerous occasions that in the past several years, our City Council has approved all rezoning applications. This is about to change.

The Citizens’ Growth Management Initiative, now known as Proposition 202, has made it to Arizona’s November ballot. This proposition has development interests and their cronies scared. Why? Because Proposition 202 puts growth decisions where they belong: with the citizens of Arizona and not with the few who stand to make a killing at our expense. Let’s look at what Proposition 202 will do for us, our children, and our beautiful landscapes.

First, Proposition 202 will require that every city and town of 2,500 or more people establish growth areas with clearly defined boundaries. Development outside of these areas will be limited as public services are prohibited from being extended past the boundaries at public expense. Best of all, we as a community establish where our growth areas will be. Is the area surrounding Walnut Canyon a community treasure? We can designate that area as open space while calling for development in more appropriate areas of town. It’s our decision. After we’ve had input into the establishment of growth areas, we then get to make an unprecedented move. We get to VOTE on these plans. And these plans will have teeth. Developers can’t hire expensive consultants and engineers to sway City Council votes. Flagstaff citizens have the final say. Opponents of Proposition 202 don’t want you to know this and so they claim that this proposition takes away local control. Don’t believe them! 

Next, the same people who have pledged to spend $3-4 million to see Proposition 202 defeated will finally be responsible for the full costs of their developments. No more public subsidies for schools, roads, sewer and water, and police and fire protection for new development. Our tax dollars can then be used for more meaningful programs instead of paying for costs associated with new development. There’s a financial incentive to developers to build closer to the core of our cities, as infrastructure is less costly closer in. 

Why hasn’t our legislature given us real growth management? Because our current legislature has a vested interest in the status quo. Once they saw that the Citizens’ Growth Management Initiative was a reality, they came up with Growing Smarter Plus. This piece of legislation, which is already law, is window dressing designed to distract you from the truth: Arizona desperately needs to do something about its growth or risk losing the quality of life that we all hold so dear. To further distract you, you’ll be asked to vote on Proposition 100 which is actually detrimental to growth management. Proposition 100 would protect NO MORE than three percent of State Trust Lands while leaving 97 percent open to development. Let’s say “no thanks” to this lame referendum and wait while Arizona’s conservation community comes up with meaningful State Trust Land protections. 

But distracting legislation wasn’t all that our legislature had up its sleeve to try to ensure that Proposition 202 fails in November. The legislative council created a biased “analysis” of our Initiative. This distorted analysis was going to be the official description of the Citizen’s Growth Management Initiative published in voter’s guides. Instead of describing the Initiative, this analysis described Growing Smarter Plus and indicated that Arizona already had the growth management tools available under Proposition 202. On July 14, 2000, Citizens for Growth Management, the coalition of nearly 50 grassroots organizations, neighborhood groups, and businesses that are supporting Proposition 202, filed a legal challenge to this analysis. On Aug. 7, the Arizona Supreme Court issued a decision finding that this analysis was indeed biased. You’ll now see a new description of Proposition 202 in your voter guides. 

Despite battles with Arizona’s growth-at-all-costs legislature, and being outspent by about six to one, our grassroots coalition is holding firm and we’re determined to see Proposition 202 passed this November. We wouldn’t be facing off with Arizona’s most powerful and influential developers, lobbyists, and industry groups if we didn’t feel that the Citizens’ Growth Management Initiative, Proposition 202, was absolutely critical to preserving our quality of life, natural heritage, and wildlife habitat. On November 7, you’ll be asked to make your own decision.

Who do you believe? A consortium of high-powered developers and industry representatives? Or a group of nearly 50 grassroots organizations and businesses including Friends of Flagstaff's Future, the League of Women Voters of Arizona, the Arizona Public Health Association, Grand Canyon Trust, and the Sierra Club, to name but a few? I hope you’ll join with us in supporting Proposition 202. This may be our last chance to save the unique qualities we all treasure in our beautiful state.

For more information on Proposition 202, call Friends of Flagstaff's Future at 556-8663 or check out the web site: www.prop202yes.com.

Becky Schipper is a life-long resident of Flagstaff and the director of Friends of Flagstaff's Future.