A community forum for the discussion of progressive ideas


Vol. 3, Num. 8

August 2002

Free -- Donations appreciated


Senate Committee hears Black Mesa Trust testimony on Peabody mining

By Tanya Lee
Flagstaff Resident  

For the second time in as many months, Black Mesa Trust testified before the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs about the Office of Surface Mining’s failure to fulfill its trust responsibilities to the Hopi and Navajo People.

On July 17, Black Mesa Trust Executive Director Vernon Masayesva testified, "For more than 10 years, the Office of Surface Mining (OSM) has allowed the world’s largest coal company, Peabody Energy, to take billions of gallons of pristine ground water and billions of gallons more of surface water from our lands without conducting a complete and objective assessment of the environmental and cultural impacts of such a loss."

Peabody Energy uses 4,000 acre-feet a year of N-aquifer water for its coal mining operation at the Black Mesa Mine. Much of the water is used to slurry coal from the mine to the Mohave Generating Station in Laughlin, Nevada.

In addition, Peabody impounds 250 million gallons of surface water at the mine site each year without any plan to treat and release the water, which is essential to Hopi religious and cultural life and to Moencopi farmers.

Masayesva explained to the Committee that "Hopi people believe that the earth itself is alive, that water is the earth’s life blood, and that life on earth comes from and returns to water."

When the Hopi People settled on Black Mesa, said Masayesva, they were given three things by the guardian of the land, Ma’saw — corn seeds, a planting stick, and a gourd of water. "With these simple tools, the Hopi People entered into a covenant with Ma’saw to live a simple life of reverence and respect for the land and to help steward the land." He explained that the Hopi not only use N-aquifer water to drink and bathe in, but that the water is sacred.

Masayesva said that OSM has never taken the sacredness of N-aquifer water into account. "OSM has not approached an impact assessment using the values and cultural perspective of the people it claims to protect, but rather from the utilitarian perspective of the company it is supposed to regulate. ... OSM does not view water drawn from the Navajo Aquifer as sacred, but as a commodity whose value lies in its utility."

He then went on to tell the Committee that OSM’s analysis of environmental and cultural impacts of the Black Mesa Mine is flawed on technical grounds as well. For example, OSM has admitted that the United States Geological Survey hydrological model to assess impacts of water mining is inaccurate and "provides no basis to rationally assess the impact of drawing billions of gallons of water each year from the Navajo Aquifer."

"For years," Masayesva said, "Hopi farmers and ranchers who walk the land have been saying what hard data now show: Large scale withdrawals have seriously damaged the Navajo Aquifer." Despite that data, however, "OSM has taken no action toward restoring the health of the aquifer, nor has OSM ever required Peabody to submit a reclamation plan for the N-aquifer as part of its mine application."

He went on to discuss the failure of OSM’s permitting process to give Hopi and Navajo people a chance to have full and meaningful consultation on Peabody’s new mining application, citing, among other factors, the failure of OSM to provide written materials in non-technical language and the difficulty people would have just getting to the few places where they could look at the application.

Finally, he said that on June 19, OSM cancelled the informal conferences on the mining application that it had promised to hold on Hopi and Navajo this summer. The reason OSM gave was that Peabody had identified an alternative source of water for the coal slurry. Yet, said Masayesva, the application Southern California Edison (the majority owner of Mohave) submitted to the California Public Utility Commission states that the feasibility and cost of the alternative water source is still being investigated.

"As things stand now, the people most affected by the Black Mesa Mine have been shut out of the public participation process. As a result, in my opinion, an illegal depletion of trust assets is occurring."

For more information about Black Mesa Trust, visit www.blackmesatrust.org.

Editor’s note: Writer Tanya Lee is affiliated with Black Mesa Trust.