|
Additional
letters to the editor
|
|
Letters from Dave Sherman, Brenda
Mooney, Judy Jung, Sherrian Bloomquist
Web exclusive
Like many, I am concerned about the continued
viability and integrity of the Flagstaff Tea Party. There
can be no doubt that the paper aspires to admirable goals,
and is all integral part of our community’s efforts to
reclaim its voice.
Likewise, there can be no doubt that in the year since the
paper began, our community has suffered some hardship. We
have lost beloved bookstores. We wrestle with the shrinking
number ma-and-pa" businesses in town, and we are
constantly struggling to maintain those small town qualities
that make Flagstaff a unique and personable place. One of
the remaining beacons in town is Mountain Harvest, the only
locally owned organic health and food store in town.
Mountain Harvest is not perfect, yet it aspires to be
something better. To do so, they have had to make changes.
Desired improvements have been postponed, expansions delayed
(they just got it stove after being open over two years) and
everyone has had to make sacrifices. This has been done to
maintain both a unique store as well as a unique attitude.
It has not been easy.
According to Dan Frazier, Mtn. Harvest is the kind of store
that the Tea Party would like to support. That would seem
obvious. Less obvious is exactly how that support will
manifest itself. The Tea Party's vision to accept
advertising from New Frontiers will, of course, affect Mtn.
Harvest in some small way. However, most disturbing is the
"dilution of integrity" (a board member's words)
that such a decision represents.
I imagine that some politicians get elected with idealism in
their eye, only to see that evaporate in the corrupting of
Washington, D.C., Inside the Beltway, lots or decisions are
made out of the “need” to stay in office and/or to
generate financial donations. Rather quickly the reason for
being there is lost in the "need" to stay there.
I worry that such a transformation is well underway within te
Tea Party. I worry that the relationship
between the paper's goals and the reality it is
actually creating will continue to deteriorate. I worry that
soon, the promises and idealism of Flagstaff's only local
paper will soon not be worth the recycled paper it is
printed on.
I urge the Tea Party to seriously consider where it is
actually going, and where it wants to go. As the two diverge
at such a young age, it may soon be impossible to reorient
the paper back to its admirable roots. I hope such is not
the case — for the sake of the town, Dan and Lisa and the
countless others that have donated time and money in the
hopes of creating something different.
Dave Sherman
Flagstaff
How astounding
that William Edelen has sources for his article "The
Female
Supreme Being- the Goddess" that are unknown to historians, archeologists,
and anthropologists. .
His article makes claims that go back 25, 000 years.
It amazes me
that this man has attained such knowledge.
Was he picked up by
an alien spaceship, time-traveled back 25,000 years, and then
gently
deposited in front of his computer (the one with crystals
hanging all about}?
This psuedo-scientist/historian claims that the world was
created 25,000
years ago by a female goddess. This was at the coldest period of the Ice
Age. Temperatures
were 59 degrees colder than today.
Yet at a time when the
world was so cold, ancient man did take time for art.
Female figurines which
depicted pregnant women were produced in Europe.
Even the bas-relief of the
pregnant Venus of Laussel has been found in Southern France.
Because there
was no written language at the time, how can we know what
these figurines
represented? Modern
man has called primitive pregnant figurines
"Venuses".
They are viewed as symbols of fertility.
Even today, pregnant women are
revered. Who
knows? Maybe
these primitive figurines were the ancient man's
Playboy.
As I see it, modern science has found evidence that ancient
man probably
worshiped the Sun. Drawings found in caves caused scientists
to come to this
conclusion. This
period was known as prehistory and the knowledge of it only
comes in fragmented artifacts which are open to
interpretation. I
really
haven't looked upon the Sun as sexual, but hey, I'm
open-minded. Maybe,
cave
art and pottery
shards tell a story that no one
but Edelen has seen.
Edelen writes that "about
2800 or so years ago there was a sex change".
Even the numbers don't add up. The Jewish calendar dates back to the year
3761 B.C. So
this puts creation for the Jews, Muslims, and Christians at
about 5762 years ago. Because
man was believed to be created in God's
image, these cultures believe God to be male.
In Mesopotamia around 4000 B.C., written language first
exists. Male
gods
ruled over the female goddesses. Ra, the Sun God, ruled in Ancient Egypt.
Egyptians also revered Osirus, husband to Isis.
The Greeks looked up to Zeus
from whose head his famous daughter Athena was sprung.
Jupiter took the
place of Zeus in Roman culture.
Maybe God is a woman. Perhaps, 25,000 years ago,
this female goddess created
a world full of nurturing and warmth.
We have artifacts which show
that
during the Ice Age women were fertile.
We do not have evidence that God was
a woman. I
ask: Where's the proof?
Mr. Edelen's
writings are fiction.
If your paper wants to be taken
seriously by an educated public, you need to have
articles based on fact,
not imagination.
Leave the sensational stories for the tabloids.
Brenda Mooney
Munds Park
Hi Dan, Lisa and Everyone!
Thank
God you are there, FTP!
After reading the totally biased report by AZ Daily
Sun Editor, Randy Wilson, in today's (10/21/01) Sunday paper
in his column, Between The Lines, about "anti-fluoridationists,"
it seems Flagstaff is living in a police state, citizens are
being told only one side of the story in that paper.
His words mislead the public and he has completely
ignored reputable sources that oppose fluoridation and
scientific results that at the very least cause much doubt
about fluoridation. Where
is Randy Wilson's scientific proof that fluoride is safe?
Those
of us who are proponents for safe drinking water have sent
MANY letters to the Editor to inform the public and offer
websites, the library and other sources to go to, and these
letters are not getting printed.
My LTE was rejected due to "no sources
referenced," so I faxed Randy Wilson 7 pages of source
documents and quotes from reputable persons.
To no avail. Either
he can't read and/or his Christmas bonus is tied to
supporting fluoride.
What
a sham for AZ Daily Sun to represent itself as a public
information source. In
the movie, "Sneakers," now on video, there was a
most profound line. It
was something like, "It isn't the people who own the
guns who have the power.
It is those who control the information who have the
power." In
other words, we will be "held captive" by knowing
only what those who hold the power want us to know.
Thank God for FTP!
If I were (when I am) a multimillionaire your paper
will go to every home!
I
had already canceled our subscription to the AZ Daily Sun
and only occasionally bought the Sunday paper.
As of today I will never again buy another AZ Daily
Sun as long as the "would be king" (Control
Freak???), Randy Wilson is editor or if his successor
chooses the same tack.
It is one thing to have and voice a personal opinion,
but to intentionally suppress public information is
criminal. This
is not freedom of the press.
In
the long run, people like Randy Wilson will lose.
They always do, but only always.
Light ALWAYS overcomes darkness, not vice versa.
The power mongers are there for self-gain, for their
moments of "power" or glory, not for the welfare
of all and we the people are rapidly becoming wise to these
selfish motives.
To
quote Sathya Sai Baba, "If you cannot do good, at least
do no harm." Randy,
are you listening? Shame,
shame on you.
Thank
God you are there, FTP.
I will increase our monthly contribution, support
your work, encourage others to do the same, and meditate on
and pray for your continued success.
Judy Jung
Flagstaff
"Important concepts which seem to elude proponents of
fluoridation and Randy Wilson from the Arizona Daily Sun in
the fluoride debate."
Isn't it "junk science" to use one's
professional standing to promote or endorse the mass
medication of an entire town via its water supply without
having determined scientifically the current fluoride intake
of Flagstaff residents?
Many chemicals are added to drinking water intending to treat
the water itself. Fluoride is the only substance added to
water that is intended to treat people. That is a
fundamental difference. Fluoride in the water is being used
to treat a human condition — not the water. Despite
protestations to the contrary, this is the definition of a
medication (look it up).
A medical professional should not prescribe any medication
without first taking a patient history. The general rule of
thumb: a good history leads to a good diagnosis and together
they form a good treatment plan. A prescription without a
patient history and appropriate lab studies to determine
dosage or need is grounds for a malpractice lawsuit. Every
medical professional is required by law to know everything
about the drug being prescribed: appropriate dose,
interactions with other drugs, potential side effects, and
any risk factors specific to each patient.
Water fluoridation is irresponsible because once fluoride is
in the water supply the dose can not be controlled. People
drink varying amounts of water and get fluoride from other
sources as well. "One size fits all" doesn't apply
when medicating individuals.
Children under the age of 6 months should receive NO fluoride
at all. Certain people are at risk for fluoride toxicity —
this includes children, the elderly, those with deficiencies
of calcium, magnesium, vitamin C and people with heart and
kidney problems. To put some people at risk to benefit
another group with a non-life-threatening and non-
contagious condition when other alternatives are readily
available is unethical at best and quackery at worse.
Sherrian Bloomquist, RN
Flagstaff
|