|
Pilot survey exposes high school
bullying
|
|
Flagstaff
Unified School District students answer questions about
harassment
(Longer Web Version)
By Lisa
Rayner
Tea
Party Publisher
An April pilot survey of Flagstaff Unified School District
high school students has uncovered significant problems with
bullying. A Flagstaff Safe Schools Coalition is forming to
address the issues revealed by the survey. In addition, FUSD
is starting two pilot programs this fall that the district
hopes will lessen bullying incidents.
Bullying
includes verbal and emotional abuse like teasing, taunting,
ridicule, intimidation, threats, rumors, graffiti, jokes,
gestures, ostracization, shunning, and scapegoating, as well
as extortion, robbery and physical and sexual assault. Bullying
of minority students is also a hate crime. The practice of
hazing, in which a student joining a school team or club is
forced to undergo ritualized harassment, is also a form of
bullying. School-initiated bullying often continues outside
of school in neighborhoods, malls and other places where
students gather. Bullying may also be committed by school
staff or faculty members.
Bullying does not include “joking around” or fighting between friends
or equals. Those bullied are usually considered
“outsiders” by other students and are perceived to be
weaker physically, psychologically or socially. Victims
include children who belong to minority groups, physically
or mentally handicapped students, children who are shy,
skinny or overweight, and many, many others — anyone
considered an “outsider” by other students.
Bullying
is “a problem in every school in the country,” says
Scott Poland, president of the National Association of
School Psychologists. “Bullying Behaviors Among U.S.
Youth,” published in the April 25 Journal of the American
Medical Association reports that 30 percent of students are
moderately or frequently involved in bullying, as victims,
bullies or both.
The efforts to educate people about the seriousness of school bullying are
where the civil rights, child abuse and women’s rights
movements were 25-35 years ago, say many advocates of
“zero-tolerance” bullying policies. However, some
parents, teachers and school administrators continue to
contend that bullying is “just a part of growing up.”
Bullying
in FUSD schools
The Flagstaff chapter of
Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays created a Safe
Schools Task Force a couple of years ago to address
harassment in Flagstaff public schools for gay, lesbian,
bisexual, transgendered and questioning youth. PFLAG is a
national nonprofit that “promotes the health and
well-being of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered
persons, their families and friends through support,
education, and advocacy. PFLAG provides opportunity for
dialog about sexual orientation and gender identity, to
create a society that is respectful of human diversity.”
PFLAG initiated the FUSD pilot
survey to evaluate harassment in the areas of race, gender,
sexual orientation and other categories. PFLAG collaborated
with a FUSD teacher trained in the National Education
Association’s Teaching Tolerance program and six Northern
Arizona University undergraduate sociology students who
undertook the survey as a class project under the direction
of Dr. Anne Medill. The survey was administered with the
knowledge of FUSD Superintendent Larry Bramblett.
252
students attending all three FUSD high schools completed the
survey questions, out of nearly 4,000 district high school
students. Surveys were administered to students in English
classes to obtain a fairly representative sample of
students. However, not all grades are represented at each
school. Also, students in the participating classes could
choose whether or not they wished to complete the survey.
The
survey questions included whether or not students have heard
or experienced verbal or physical harassment by other
students or faculty or staff, where bullying occurs, whether
or not students or faculty or staff intervene, and whether
there are places in
school where some students do not feel safe.
PFLAG President Robert Audet says, “Preliminary survey results
revealed greater harassment than we expected, across all
three areas evaluated.” The
survey is currently being analyzed. The
complete survey data and analysis will be released to the
public in a few months. The Flagstaff Safe Schools
Coalition hopes to undertake a more scientifically accurate
(and expensive) survey of FUSD schools and local private and
charter schools in the future.
Preliminary
FUSD Safe School Survey results:
·
65 percent of students have heard offensive words about ethnicity,
race, gender or sexual orientation “frequently”
in school.
·
“Bitch”
and “that’s gay” are heard the most frequently. “Lez,”
“faggot” and “nigger” are other commonly used words.
·
66 percent have heard such offensive words spoken by
students.
·
28 percent have heard such words spoken by faculty or
staff.
·
These words are most commonly spoken outside of
classrooms, in locations such as hallways, locker rooms and
the cafeteria.
·
20 percent of students say someone “never”
intervenes.
·
3 percent say someone “frequently” intervenes.
·
Faculty or staff and students intervene a nearly equal
amount.
·
8 percent of students say they have been “frequently”
subjected to “verbal abuse, physical threats or cruel
teasing” at school.
·
20 percent say they have been “sometimes” subjected
to such harassment.
·
10 percent say they have “never” been called these
names at school.
·
6.3 percent say they have “frequently” experienced
unwelcome physical contact at school.
·
18 percent have “sometimes” experienced unwelcome
physical contact.
·
31 percent say, “There are places in this school where
students do not feel safe.”
·
40 percent say that if they received verbal abuse or
physical threats they would not feel comfortable seeking
help from faculty or staff.
·
Sinagua High School appears to have the most problems
with bullying.
A
problem with bullying in FUSD schools is not a new
phenomenon. In 1998, the
parents of a FUSD high school student filed a complaint form
with the federal Office for Civil Rights that said their
daughter was raped inside her school.
One of the girl’s parents spoke to me recently. The parent says
“Jeannie,” an attractive student, and some other female
students, had experienced routine sexual harassment at
school — “graphic verbal intimidation” involving
“humiliating put-down language” with detailed
descriptions of female sexual anatomy and exactly what the
boys doing the harassment would like to do to the girls
sexually. This parent describes the offending boys as
“predators.”
Jeannie
also says she was often pushed into lockers as she walked
down school hallways. In addition, someone unsuccessfully
attempted to push her down a flight of stairs.
Jeannie’s
parents eventually decided Jeannie was in growing physical
danger, so they pulled her out of the school and enrolled
her elsewhere. Only after Jeannie began attending her new
school did it become clear to Jeannie’s parents that their
daughter had been raped six months earlier.
Jeannie
says she told a teacher at her old school about the rape
soon after it happened. The parents say the teacher
apparently did not notify anyone else. Teachers are required
by law to report illegal activities or incidents that cause
harm to a student.
When
Jeannie’s parents finally learned of their daughter’s
rape, they immediately reported the incident to the
Flagstaff police department. They then sought legal counsel,
who helped them obtain an Office for Civil Rights complaint
form from the regional Denver OCR office.
The
Office for Civil Rights is part of the Department of
Education. OCR enforces federal statutes that prohibit
discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin,
disability, sex and age in education programs and activities
that receive federal funding.
At
the time Jeannie’s parents filed their complaint, it had
not been made clear to them that FUSD had an administrator
who handled sexual harassment complaints, Kevin Brown. Brown
is the Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources and the
Title IX Compliance Officer. Title IX is the federal law
that prohibits sexual harassment and discrimination. They
were also not aware that OCR complaint forms were available
at district schools.
Federal
OCR officers came to Flagstaff to investigate the complaint.
The officers visited the school and talked to
administrators, teachers and students. The OCR was not
legally allowed to tell anyone, even the district, the exact
nature of the complaint, except that it involved sexual
harassment.
The
OCR officers then put together a “resolution” that
included suggestions by Jeannie and her parents. Jeannie and
her parents wanted to know that FUSD staff understood the
seriousness of the sexual harassment problem and would take
practical steps to eliminate it. They wanted the district to
make the school atmosphere safer, including a look at the
physical layout of the school, which they say contains
potentially unsafe locations, and the creation of a hotline
to handle complaints.
After
the investigation, FUSD officials signed a “commitment to
resolve” that would include the creation of a new district
sexual harassment policy, training of all faculty, staff and
students in sexual harassment issues, and a hot line.
In
April 1999, an OCR representative returned to Flagstaff to
conduct sexual harassment workshops attended by all district
faculty, staff and administrators. A public meeting was held
for parents to solicit further comments.
FUSD Superintendent Larry Bramblett came to the
district during the OCR investigation and resolution
process.
“I’m just not sure that (the district) took
(sexual harassment) seriously. … I think there’s a level
of intolerance here, whether it’s around Navajos or around
sexuality” or other forms of intolerance. “I think they
just were letting things go here way too long. … On the
surface we’ve cleaned those things up. How far that’s
gone down (the staff hierarchy), I don’t know.”
Bramblett
says that during his first year at FUSD, there were a lot of
complaints about various forms of harassment, but that in
the last couple of years, complaints have dwindled.
Kevin Brown, who handles all discrimination
complaints that fall under federal civil rights laws, says
the district has worked hard to address sexual harassment
problems since OCR’s visits.
“We endeavored to not only rewrite the policy, but
change our process for employees and students in regards to
knowing what sexual harassment is, how to recognize it, how
to report it.”
All FUSD schools now have anti-sexual harassment
posters hanging in visible locations such as entryways and
administrative offices. Student handbooks and a special
brochure describe district policy, lets students and parents
know that Brown is the Title IX Compliance Officer, and
describes how to file a complaint, at the local school
level, to Brown or directly to the Office for Civil Rights.
“I go out every year and I review the policy with
employees,” says Brown. “Health teachers review the
policy with students; Principals review it with students;
Teachers review it with students.
“Since OCR’s visit,
we’ve had over 50 investigations that have come through my
office.”
Brown says that each time he
speaks to students he finds students who are not yet aware
of the sexual harassment policy or how to file a complaint.
No one has yet used the sexual harassment hotline to
file a complaint.
Outgoing Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum
Instruction Lee Treece says that very often, “The people
who do the sexual harassment or the people who see the
harassment aren’t even aware that it’s harassment. They
sometimes chalk it off to, ‘Well it’s normal behavior
that’s how people are,’ or ‘That’s humor,’ and yet
they’re feeling uncomfortable. … Sexual harassment is in
the eyes of the beholder. If you believe you are being
sexually harassed, you are being sexually harassed and it
must be treated that way. And that’s sort of hard for some
people to understand. That’s one of the things that sets
it aside from other kinds of harassment.”
Slurs are a common form of
harassment in FUSD high schools. “Bitch” and “that’s gay” are frequently
used by students. During the last school year, some students
reported to PFLAG that a couple of teachers had used
anti-gay slurs in their classrooms.
Brown
says, “If a slur rises to the level of interfering with a
child’s ability to learn or an employees’s ability to
work or be hired, then it becomes discrimination. A slur in
and of itself is not discrimination.
“For
example, when things get defined legally, they often go
through various permutations because of lawsuits that help
to define something. So if you look at OCR’s definition of
discrimination based on sex, sexual harassment, it’s
comments, it’s gestures, it’s pictures, it’s touch,
e-mail, anything of a sexual nature that falls into two
categories.
“It’s
either ‘hostile environment’ or ‘quid pro quo’
sexual harassment. A hostile environment is created,
usually, over a period of time with repeated offences. If I
said a sexually oriented joke to you right now, it would
probably be very inappropriate, but it may not rise to the
level of sexual harassment, because it’s totaling one.
Now, if (I do so) every time I see you, that’s ‘hostile
environment.’ Quid pro quo, on the other hand, is when
someone asks for sexual favors in exchange for something. If
I was a teacher and you were my student and I said ‘I’ll
give you a better grade’ for whatever of a sexual nature,
that would be quid pro quo. Even one incident of quid pro
quo rises to the level of sexual harassment discrimination.
However,
says Brown, “A slur is wrong at any time. It may not be
‘discriminatory,’ but it’s wrong.”
Brown
brought up student’s use of the phrase “that’s gay,”
saying that his own daughter had used the term at home when
she was a high school student. He asked her what the term
meant. She replied, “That means (something’s) stupid.
… Everybody says it, it’s just an expression.”
“When
I was in high school,” says Brown, “kids were saying,
‘groovy’ or ‘bitching’ or ‘boss,’ in the 60s.
And, what I heard from my daughter is that that expression,
‘that’s gay’ was sort of like a figure of speech, not
meant to be slanderous or a slur towards people. One of our
responsibilities I think as a school is to help young people
understand that things can be inappropriate.”
Many
people would categorize “that’s gay,” which is
blatantly derogatory towards gay people, differently than an
adjective like “groovy.”
Bramblett thinks “a lot of
kids are the brunt of some form of harassment at one time or
another. I think there are probably very few kids who escape
it. … For some kids it helps them realize what the world
is like. On the other hand, I think it becomes a burden for
some kids. … Some kids learn from the experiences. They
learn two things, one, to stay away from those people (doing
the bullying), and two that they know how it feels, so I
think they wouldn’t want to do it to someone else. … I
think kids who are ‘odd’ in any respect probably take a
good deal of that.
“Kids who are being harassed
have to know how to handle it. … On the other hand, the
kids who are doing the harassing need to know what the
limits are.”
The
FUSD Policy on Student Conduct explicitly prohibits all
types of slander, verbal abuse, extortion, hazing and other
forms of bullying. FUSD also recently adopted a policy that
prohibits discrimination of students or employees based on
sexual orientation.
The
official FUSD harassment reporting policy is for students
and their parents to first report a bullying complaint to a
teacher or guidance counselor. If the situation is not
handled to the satisfaction of the student being harassed,
the next step is to take the complaint to the school
Principal. Finally, complaints may be made either to Kevin
Brown or to the new Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum
Instruction, Dr. Judy Coates, who handles disciplinary
issues. Civil rights violations may also be reported
directly to the federal Office for Civil Rights.
However,
Bramblett thinks that current policy, which focuses on
disciplinary actions against bullies, including in or out of
school suspensions as a final punishment, doesn’t work
very well. Being suspended for several days “doesn’t
mean that (the suspended student has) learned what the issue
is. … I very seldom see that fixing anything.”
Bullies
need to learn empathy for their victims and how to handle
conflict appropriately, says Bramblett.
Making schools safe
Twenty
percent of FUSD
students reported on the
survey that students, faculty and staff “never”
intervene in bullying incidents. Forty percent say that if
they received verbal abuse or physical threats they would
not feel comfortable seeking help from faculty or staff.
National
research shows that student bystanders are present during 85
percent of bullying incidents. Student bystanders usually
remain silent lest the bullies turn on them or they lose
social status among their peers by associating with the
victims.
One
recent study showed that two-thirds of students ages 14 to
17 don't believe bullies get in trouble, so many are
disinclined to report it.
Many
bullying victims are afraid to tell parents or teachers
about the abuse for fear they will receive retaliation from
their tormentors, say researchers. FUSD policy expressly
prohibits such retaliation.
In
addition, National Education Association President Bob Chase
says, “When parents complain to the schools about
bullying, little is done to correct the problem. School
officials frequently react with indifference, or even go as
far as to blame the victim.”
For example, “Hatred in the Hallways: Violence and
Discrimination Against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and
Transgender Students in U.S. Schools," a study released
in July by Human Rights Watch, found that school officials
often refuse to document reports of harassment against gay
youth. Some school officials blame LGBT students for their
abuse, saying the students provoke attacks against
themselves by flaunting their identity and by not being
“normal.”
Former
bullying victim and founder of the Raven Days web site
Meredith Dixon says, “In the wake of the recent school
shootings, kids are being encouraged to inform teachers and
parents about any classmates they have suspicions about,
anyone who doesn't ‘fit in.’ … Not only do the
much-publicized ‘safer schools’ programs do nothing to
help such students; they can actually harm them, by adding a
veneer of legitimacy to their classmates' attacks.”
Furthermore,
parents are often given
the advice that they can help their child by working to
“toughen him up” to better withstand the bullying, says
Chase.
Today,
most people would not say to a battered woman or a child
abused at home, “If your self-esteem was higher, you
wouldn’t feel so bad about the abuse” or “You just
need to learn how to be more assertive.” Instead, safety
is the first priority. If need be, the victim is given
shelter from the abuse. Actions are taken to stop the
abuser. Counseling to help the victim regain her self-esteem
is conducted within the context that the abuse is not her
fault. The public is educated to look out for such abuse, to
intervene when possible, to report incidents to authorities
and to help create a culture of nonviolence.
Safe
schools programs are proliferating in the U.S., but there is
little evidence that most have a measurable impact on
bullying, researchers say.
Bramblett
agrees, saying, “It seems to me that those programs are in
the hole. Like the drug program (D.A.R.E.), it’s generally
a failure. They put a lot of money into it and get very
little in return.”
The
most effective anti-bullying programs involve a
“zero-tolerance” whole-school approach. The JAMA study
says that such “school-based interventions have
demonstrated positive outcomes in Norway and England, with
reductions in bullying of 30-50 percent. These interventions
focused on changes within the school and classroom climate
to increase awareness about bullying, increase teacher and
parent involvement and supervision, form clear rules and
strong social norms against bullying, and provide support
and protection for individuals bullied.”
That
is just what FUSD hopes to accomplish with two pilot
programs starting this fall district-wide. “We really
wanted to get something that would address these issues
school-wide,” rather than in a patchwork fashion says
Bramblett.
Treece
says, “Like every other school in the country, we’re
worried about violence in the schools, and we’re certainly
worried abut it escalating to the levels that we’ve seen
in places like Columbine and Arkansas, and other places. And
we began to look around for programs.”
FUSD
administrators listened to presentations by a number of
program sponsors and picked the Responsible Thinking and
Creative Response to Conflict programs.
The
Responsible Thinking program teaches students how to think
through all kinds of issues, both academic and social and to
learn to behave in responsible ways — “to get kids to
start to think about, understand and then model”
appropriate behaviors, says Bramblett.
Regarding
bullying, Bramblett says “A lot of these kids … bully
because they’re being bullied at home or see their parents
doing exactly the same thing. … If you take this same kid
that’s doing the bullying, can he understand what it feels
like on the other side? Can he look beyond people in terms
of their size or sex or glasses or whatever the issue is?
Can he look beyond them to see inside the person?
The
Creative Response to Conflict program is “a language and a
methodology of handling conflict that does not include
violent reactions,” says Treece. “It trains people how
to think ahead: ‘I can see that this conflict is
escalating, the language is telling me that it’s
escalating,’ and the body posture of people, you can just
tell that things are getting worse.”
The
program was first created in New York State in the early
70s.
“The
hope is, what if we had a community, certainly a school
community, where kids were used to this language, the
nonviolent response? When they move from Weitzel Elementary
to Mount Elden Middle School they (will) say, ‘Oh, I know
how this works. This is how we deal with conflict,’ says
Treece.
“We
talk about it, we do some things, we take time outs, we
orchestrate a way that allows for the fact that there will
be conflict, whether it’s student to student, teacher to
teacher, whether it’s student to teacher, that there’s a
way to do this without escalating it, and the people in the
know, the teachers and administrators, are well versed in
applying this, that they are trained to say, ‘We can see
this has gone the wrong way’ very early on, and they can
do something to respond appropriately.
The
aim of CRC is to create an “ambience of a safe
environment” where all children feel accepted and learn
tolerance for others, says Treece.
The
district has been working with the CRC program for two
years. FUSD now has internal trainers who can give other
teachers 30 hours of training in the practice.
“A lot of this training is how to set up a classroom, how to
set up a school environment, whether it’s the playground,
or wherever it is, where everybody feels safe, that there
are ways and mechanisms to handle conflicts that come up,”
says Treece.
The
district is also experimenting with two other programs at
specific schools.
Killip
elementary currently has a grant-funded program that
provides violence prevention education, including discussion
of both violence at school and domestic violence. The
program also has a Community Educator who works with the
Sunnyside Weed and Seed program to build community support
for the violence prevention program.
Beaver
elementary school has a “character” oriented program
that is part of the school’s magnet status. Parents must
sign a contract on how their kids will behave in order to
send their children to the school. Students also wear
uniforms as part of the program.
Bramblett says of the program,
“Character
is one of those things that’s carried over on to the
playground, where the older the kids become the monitors and
the explainers of things to younger kids. They pretty much
hold themselves responsible for their own actions. They talk
about character every day, in terms of their classroom and
their class work, so there’s a real bent toward trying to
instill some things in kids early on. … The kids are real
polite. I think by being in a school like that, kids start
to pick up what other kids are doing in that school.”
Treece
emphasizes that these programs are intended to work
systemically to reduce the potential for violence and
instill tolerance and that they do not replace reporting
specific harassment incidents.
“If
somebody’s being harassed, they need to know that … we
have a whole process for dealing with any kind of
harassment,” as noted above, says Treece. “We
have people who are trained to investigate and order some
kind of verdict, some kind of corrective action.” In
addition, “We do have police at the other end if it’s
just not going to work for some people.”
Treece says, “You don’t
want to be in a situation where something catastrophic
happens and then you’ve got to run around and figure out
what you should do … even if you’re not looking at
something escalating to a Columbine. Even if you just look
at the day-to-day life of kids — there are a lot of kids
(for whom) school doesn’t feel like a very friendly
environment to them, and it’s very often the kids (doing
the harassing), (who are) making them uncomfortable, and
maybe adults who just aren’t trained to be sensitive and
know what it is. The ‘Kids will be kids’ or ‘Boys will
be boys’ … excuses really don’t fly.”
Title
IX Compliance Officer Kevin Brown: 527-6070.
FUSD
sexual harassment hotline number: 527-6030.
Federal Office for Civil Rights: http://www.ed.gov/offices/OCR.
OCR toll-free hotline:
1-800-421-3481.
Regional OCR office: U.S.
Department of Education, Federal Building, 1244 Speer
Boulevard, Suite 310, Denver, CO 80204-3582. Tel:
303-844-5695, Fax: 303-844-4303; TDD: 303-844-3417, E-mail:
OCR_Denver@ed.gov.
“Anyone
wishing to file a formal complaint with OCR should submit in
writing the following information in a letter or on the
Discrimination Complaint Form available from OCR enforcement
offices or the FUSD Administrative Center, 3285 E. Sparrow
Lane, Flagstaff, AZ 86004:
·
Your name and address (a telephone number
where you may be reached during business hours is helpful,
but not required).
·
A general description of the person(s) or
class of persons injured by the alleged discriminatory act(s)
(names of the injured person(s) are not required).
·
The name and location of the institution that
committed that alleged discriminatory act(s).
·
A description of the alleged discriminatory
act(s) in sufficient detail to enable OCR to understand what
occurred, when it occurred, and the basis for the alleged
discrimination (race, color, national origin, sex,
disability, or age).”
“A
complaint must be filed within 180 calendar days of the date
of the alleged discrimination.”
Human Rights Watch report
"Hatred in the Hallways": http://www.hrw.org/reports/2001/uslgbt/
|