|
Peacemaking:
a family affair
by James W. Zion, Solicitor to the Courts
We
are so used to presenting problems to powerful
decision-makers (judges) for them to resolve that we cannot
seem to understand that there are other approaches. But
there is an Indian point of view. As Professor Leroy Little
Bear of the Blood Nation in Alberta once put it, "The
law shamans of White People must be very wise, because they
can find the truth based on the lies of lawyers."
Navajo
peacemaking is not so much a search for "truth" as
it is a quest for reconciliation. Here is a story to explain
this.
In
1996, Ethelyn Begay went to her nephew's home with a gun,
shot at his dogs, and told him she was going to put a bullet
in him. She later went before a judge and was found guilty
of threatening and the unlawful use of a weapon. Begay asked
if she could take the case into peacemaking prior to
sentencing.
This
was not simply a dispute between two people that got out of
hand. This was a situation where a rural family, living
closely together as is the Navajo custom, was fighting over
personal property and animals.
The arrest and charges were only a symbol of family
infighting. The peacemaking session took the occasion of the
criminal charges as an opportunity for the family to
straighten out their relationships.
The
aunt's and nephew's family sat down together and developed a
written statement. It said the defendant and her victim
"resolved the disagreement, forgave each other, and
agreed to live in peace and harmony." The family
members also pledged that they would respect each other's
possessions and "Start communicating in a polite
manner, visit one another, and use k'e (clanship) to restore
the family relationship.
The
judge accepted the family's plea and dismissed the charges
against Ethelyn Begay.
In
another case, a young woman was brought into peacemaking
because of her disruptive behavior, linked to drinking. When
family members laid the problem out before the young woman,
she explained that she was acting out because she wanted to
give up drinking, and she was having difficulty doing so.
Then, she tearfully related what was bothering her and
fueling her drinking: She had been sexually molested by a
relative. This was the first time the family knew of that,
and they were shocked.
The
family came to realize that this "offender" was in
fact a "victim" who should be supported in her
efforts to deal with a personal tragedy, not punished.
Peacemakers
tell me that these cases are not unusual. In the Navajo way,
a crime is not an isolated event with an
"offender" to be punished and a "victim"
to be satisfied with punishment. A crime is evidence that
there is something wrong with relationship. An event must be
seen in the context of what created it.
Navajo
peacemaking allows people to deal with their problems in a
very intimate way, so that those in the best position to do
something about the causes of crime can make their own
choices.
|